Comments on: Dear Blue States: A Reply From the Red States http://www.kungfuquip.com/dear-blue-states-a-reply-from-the-red-states/ Thoughts On Life In The Swamp Sun, 05 Feb 2012 07:43:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: emek http://www.kungfuquip.com/dear-blue-states-a-reply-from-the-red-states/comment-page-1/#comment-11294 emek Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:02:15 +0000 http://www.kungfuquip.com/?p=928#comment-11294 Whoever wrote the original letter must be an ignorant, arrogant, Californian imbecile. Here is a nice list of flaws and problems with the assumptions and logic used to produce such a letter: 1. States such as New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Michigan, Washington, Hawaii and several others would likely side with the Red States and not the Blue. 2. Only an arrogant Californian asshole would assume that the new country would want to have "California" anywhere in its name (New California). Why not New Rhode Island? 3. Good luck implementing tough gun control laws in New Hampshire and several other "Blue" or Northeastern states. 4. Just because in the Northeast we vote more left than right does not mean we would want California in our coalition. I, for one, would vote to exclude it. 5. The Ivy League includes Harvard and Yale - a fact of which the original author clearly is not aware. Whoever wrote the original letter must be an ignorant, arrogant, Californian imbecile. Here is a nice list of flaws and problems with the assumptions and logic used to produce such a letter:

1. States such as New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Illinois, Michigan, Washington, Hawaii and several others would likely side with the Red States and not the Blue.

2. Only an arrogant Californian asshole would assume that the new country would want to have “California” anywhere in its name (New California). Why not New Rhode Island?

3. Good luck implementing tough gun control laws in New Hampshire and several other “Blue” or Northeastern states.

4. Just because in the Northeast we vote more left than right does not mean we would want California in our coalition. I, for one, would vote to exclude it.

5. The Ivy League includes Harvard and Yale – a fact of which the original author clearly is not aware.

]]> By: Adam http://www.kungfuquip.com/dear-blue-states-a-reply-from-the-red-states/comment-page-1/#comment-10963 Adam Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:11:01 +0000 http://www.kungfuquip.com/?p=928#comment-10963 This kind of stuff is exactly why we need a third party so badly. I like what this website has to say about it. Its a great idea of how to get a third (or fourth) party without impacting this election at all: http://www.thirdpartyvote.com Definitly worth a minute to check out. This kind of stuff is exactly why we need a third party so badly. I like what this website has to say about it. Its a great idea of how to get a third (or fourth) party without impacting this election at all:
http://www.thirdpartyvote.com
Definitly worth a minute to check out.

]]> By: A Reply To The Blue State Secession Craig’s List Entry « Blog Entry « Dr. Melissa Clouthier http://www.kungfuquip.com/dear-blue-states-a-reply-from-the-red-states/comment-page-1/#comment-10957 A Reply To The Blue State Secession Craig’s List Entry « Blog Entry « Dr. Melissa Clouthier Thu, 30 Oct 2008 01:46:32 +0000 http://www.kungfuquip.com/?p=928#comment-10957 [...] A Reply To The Blue State Secession Craig’s List Entry Smell ya later, Blue Staters! [...] [...] A Reply To The Blue State Secession Craig’s List Entry Smell ya later, Blue Staters! [...]

]]>