Archive for the 'Free Speech' category

More GOP Voices Join the Chorus

Today the chorus of voices calling for the national committees to open the Presidential debates grew louder.

Patrick Ruffini, David All, Liz Mair, Robert Bluey, John Hawkins, and Matt Margolis signed on to the letter calling for the RNC to require the networks carrying presidential debates to make the debate footage available under a creative commons license following the debate. These bloggers, online operatives, and activists join Mike Krempasky (founder of RedState), Michelle Malkin, former FEC Chairman Brad Smith, me and others in calling on the RNC to make this part of their negotiations.

I will also soon launch a petition for people to sign that we can deliver to the RNC along with this request. I’ll keep you posted on that.

No responses yet

Blogging for Dollars

Since I actually enjoyed Music and Lyrics, and because this article seems to imply the only reason a blogger should say that is if he’s being paid, I figured I would set the record straight. I received no compensation for plugging Hugh Grant’s movie.

To the larger question of bloggers selling posts for a fee, here’s the only problem I have with that.

Laura Neiman, 33, a Denver mother of five whose blog is called LaLa Girl, wrote wistfully about a Caribbean yacht charter service.

We don’t get a whole lot of opportunity to sail the open seas in landlocked Colorado, so I really can’t relate to this at all,” she began, “but I keep reading about the popularity of yacht charters as an alternative to a ‘regular’ vacation.” [Emphasis mine]

If you’re a blogger, and you would be writing about something anyway, I don’t really care if someone pays you to write about it. Just tell me that. Something along the lines of, “Hey, I actually like Rocky Mountain Oysters, and some clown is paying me to tell you that, so let me relate a funny story about the consumption of bull nuts.”

The trouble with something like PayPerPost is it clutters the internet with irrelevant thoughts on things people legitimately care about. I might actually be interested in a yacht charter vacation and want to read about the experience someone else had with it. I don’t care if he’s getting paid.

Instead, I have to sift through 10,000 Google results from some assholes who have never been on a boat but chose to plug the idea so they could make $6. If I wanted useless information, I would dig through the comment spam to find deals on prescription drugs I have never even heard of.

What are the arguments made by the pinheads who write on behalf of PPP?

Caldwell’s traffic has doubled thanks partly to PayPerPost’s fanatical users, who link often to fellow Posties. That gives her a bigger audience for her unpaid musings on topics including a recent dream about Rainn Wilson, the actor who plays Dwight in NBC’s sitcom “The Office.”

“People talk about how we’re destroying the credibility of the Internet,” Caldwell said. “Let me tell you ‚Äî there are a lot worse things happening online.”

Well, I agree with that last part. If this clown wasn’t busy selling posts about some crappy movie, she might well be advocating for net neutrality. If that’s the case, I say, “Blog on sister!”

For the rest of the people who have decided that posting about things they know nothing about simply so they can get a check for $5, here’s some unsolicited advice.

Rethink your life. Get off the couch, stop pitching online coupon sites to the poor bastard unlucky enough to stumble upon your blog, and use your unrealized potential to build houses for the poor or something that gives back to the world instead of cluttering up the Internet.

And yes, by god, I really did like Music and Lyrics. If you don’t believe me, you can check it out for yourself. It should be on video in a week or two. It was only in theaters for about 3 hours, but the showing I caught was in focus… so that was good.

No responses yet

Repeating The Mistakes Of Others

Last March I took issue with the RNC’s MyGOP tool for it’s overly senstive obscenity filter. As I was writing the previous post about the AdWeek article, I stumbled upon a mention of McCain’s very creative “MySite” tool. It allows you to create your own site on the McCain teams page.

Sensing a knock-off of the RNC’s MyGOP tool, I clicked through to start building my page. Sure enough, the tool is an almost exact replica of the GOP tool. To be fair, the tool should probably get much better traction on a candidate site than it did with the committee. People are more inclined to gravitate toward a campaign.

The one problem I have is the fact that McCain ported the entire application with warts and all. The biggest wart, as I pointed out last year, is the timid obscenity filter. I plugged in KungFuQuip.ExploreMcCain.com as my url. They rejected me, quite literally, for the fuq of it.

What the fuq is this world coming to when I can’t use my fuqing url because some fuqing bonehead is concerned that other fuqing people have nothing better to do than fuqing dream up ways I might misspell fuqing obscenities?

4 responses so far

Thank God The Media Protects Me

Jan 04 2007 Published by under Craziness, Crime, Free Speech, Government, News Media, Television

I keep hearing reports on TV that the Saddam Hussein hanging video is so shocking they just won’t show it on TV. They’re clearly doing it to protect me from seeing the reality of the world. Heaven forbid that I would actually see the barbarism that takes place every day in America or the rest of the world.

The guy(s) that filmed the clip should clearly be arrested and charged with all manner of crimes for blatantly preventing the government of Iraq from censoring the hanging, right? I mean, geez… What would happen to the world if people could actually see what was going on… There’d be chaos, no doubt.

Is this the most ridiculous condescending attitude ever, or is it just me? I’m not sure who declared the media and the government as the arbiters of what we are allowed to see and hear, but I’d like to ask for a recall vote on that decision. If the media really knew what I wanted to see, they’d show nothing but public executions interspersed with Britney Spears crotch shots.

No responses yet

UW-Madison Infringing on Free Speech… Again

Oct 11 2006 Published by under Free Speech, Miscellany

My alma mater has always been big on trying to make everyone feel warm and fuzzy inside. They think they need to be every student’s parents. They want to protect everyone that steps foot on university property from feeling hurt, challenged, wrong or inadequate in anyway. They don’t want to make their students better people; they want them to feel good (I should mention they only want to do this if you are a liberal. If you’re a Republican they could care less if you feel “welcomed”). Case in point: this is the same university who, time after time, is going to bat for a professor who has some very radical ideas about 9/11 (basically that Bush caused that catastrophe himself). Now do I agree with that professor? Hell no. But will I defend his right to say what he wants? Yes. THIS is what the First Amendment is all about.

For anyone who knows UW’s sordid past on speech codes, this newest program should come as no surprise. Ann Althouse blogs today that the university has launched the program “Think. Respect.” as a way for students, faculty and profs to look for, and report, any signs of harassment to the administration for further review. This goes beyond your usual harassment policies. This is basically saying that if I get into an argument with a Democrat about how stupid some of their policies are, and in the process they feel offended because I don’t agree with them, they can go download a form and report me to school officials for harassment. This is a new low for the university.

I am sick and tired of the University of Wisconsin-Madison and all of the administrators sitting on Bascom Hill thinking they can rid the campus of people feeling hurt or offended. They can’t. They are not the warm and fuzzy police. A university is supposed to be full of debate and arguments and ideas. People should feel free to speak up in class if they disagree with what someone else has to say. They should not worry that they’ll be reported to the administration for forming an opinion. I don’t like much of what liberals and Democrats will say to me. Do I go hide in a corner and cry because they are arguing with me? NO! I fight back. In fact, I’m offended that the university is enacting such a program to infringe on my First Amendment rights. Can I report them to themselves? I mean what’s next? Are they going to require all students to wear microphones and have everything they say recorded and reviewed by a panel for anything offensive? Why don’t you just remove my brain and insert a sensitivity chip?

One response so far

« Newer posts