Archive for the 'Movie Reviews' category

A Critique of NRO’s Top 25 Conservative Movies

Feb 18 2009 Published by under Conservatism, Movie Reviews, Movies, Politics, Pop Culture

A friend and colleague pointed out this list of the “Top 25 Conservative Movies” as determined by the National Review. I enjoyed his take on several of them.

Forrest Gump is “an amiable dunce who is far too smart to embrace the lethal values of the 1960s.” Uh, yeah. You know the character is mentally retarded, right?

I have to agree with his general assessment that by these standards liberals hate everything about America and its values. But looking deeper, there’s something much more troubling about the list – the fact that most of these reviews gloss over significant flaw with their own argument.

Don’t get me wrong. I’m committed to the concept of small government, fiscally responsible conservatism. I’m not an adherent to social conservatism (whether by big government or small) because social conservatism is all about telling you how to live your life. I consider that antithetical to small government conservatism.

I’m also a huge film buff, and don’t appreciate the people who try to look for hidden political agendas in film. We get it. Liberals are in charge of Hollywood. That doesn’t mean they accidentally make pro-conservative values movies.

So let’s look at a few of the NRO choices from a different perspective:

  • 24. Team America: World PoliceThere’s really nothing I can say that Parker and Stone haven’t about this. Yes, the movie is brilliant in its satirical depiction of the American left. Anderson’s synopsis, however, glosses over what the creators have said – that just as dangerous as liberal philosophy is that “overzealous” defense of America. The movie clearly regards those “defenders of freedom” as inept and likely to cause as much or more damage to the world they’re trying to save. The movie actually makes a broad point about the happy middle, and should be regarded as the #1 Movie for Moderates.
  • 20. Gattaca – Contrary to the Wesley Smith’s take on the movie, Hawke’s inability to become an astronaut is not due to lack of “enhancement” it’s due to his congenital heart defect – a defect which could have been ‘fixed’, not ‘enhanced’ genetically. The “calamitous results” described are not caused by his theft of Jude Law’s genetic identity, they’re caused by his lies and decption. To hear Smith tell it, though, we should cease all medical advancement and rejoice in disease and deformity. To me, that’s not a conservative ideology.
  • 16. Master and Commander – Underlying quite a few of the pics on this list is something almost diametrically opposed to Smith’s Gattaca review – a sense that everyone should know their place, and not aspire beyond it. We’ll see that again in “Blast from the Past” (more in a bit), but it’s best summed up by John J. Miller’s use of a New York Times quote. “It imagines the [H.M.S.] Surprise as a coherent society in which stability is underwritten by custom and every man knows his duty and his place.” Since when is “knowing your place” a conservative principle?
  • 12. Batman: The Dark Knight – this review seems to be justification for violating constitutional rights of the innocent citizen in pursuit of safety. “Batman has to devise new means of surveillance, push the limits of the law, and accept the hatred of the press and public.” Andrew Klavan goes on to explain that the things we liked in Batman we hated in GWB. True enough. I don’t mind a ficititious character eavesdropping on fictitious citizens of Gotham. I surely do mind them listening to my conversations in a nation protected (at least theoretically) by the constitution. Since when did conservatisim entail ignoring the document that specifically spells out our freedoms? If we ignore that, then the freedom we’re defending is an empty myth.
  • 9. Blast From The Past – Clearly the message here is the 1950s were a wondeful time, women should just be happy being housewives, and should spend most of their time self-medicating with champagne cocktails the way Sissy Spacek does. James Bowman needs to rewatch that movie sometime. Spacek is miserable being “trapped” in that life. She’s drunk throughout the movie and yearns to be free to wander and experience, but is literally locked into childcare by the man that seals her in her living tomb. Yet Bowman holds her up as the model of the idyllic woman’s life. My very conservative wife would take issue with that.
  • 7. The Pursuit of Happyness – This may arguably be only one of two movies on the list that I would include in my own Top 25 conservative films. However, I don’t think that drive, determination, pride, and an overwhelming desire to provide for your children are uniquely conservative. I have a lot of liberal friends that want to get ahead without handouts and provide for their kids. They work damn hard and also identify with this movie.
  • 6. Groundhog Day – As Paul said when we discussed this list, Bill Murray’s problem wasn’t that we was pursuing the fads of modernity. His problem was he was a jackass living only for himself. He was forced to relive the same day over and over until he learned that there was a world beyond himself and that he needed to be an active participant in it. If anything, I would list this movie as one of the Top 10 liberal movies of all time. It’s clear message is to deny oneself for the common good or you’ll be fated to an unsatisfying life.
  • 5. 300 – I’m not even sure that Michael Poliakoff and I watched the same movie. This is more a story about a vastly outgunned group of insurgents defending their home against foreign invaders intent on toppling their leaders. Keep in mind that the people of Sparta were also not exactly adherents to democracy – estimates are 80% of the population of Sparta were slaves. In both Iraq and Afghanistan, we were the invading force. In both cases we told their populations, the world, and ourselves that we were doing it for their benefit. Xerxes would likely have said the same.
  • 2. The Incredibles – This would be the other of the two films I think may actually belong on this list. There is a clear message that being a standout in society is frowned upon. There is a clear message that overly litigious trial lawyers are ruining the world. There is a specific sense that homogeneity is bad. However, there is also the same recurring theme that being “supers” is a protected class and only those born to it can belong. Syndrome’s sin is that he aspires to greater than his station. He’s not content being a deckhand on Mr. Incredible’s HMS Surprise. This just reinforces the recurring elitist theme on this list – just be happy with your lot in life.

Now maybe I’m a film fan first, and a political junkie second. I think that may flavor my perception of this list. However, I think the NRO list reinforces the stereotype of conservatives as elitists who believe the 1950s were some sort of panacea; that women should be barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen; and achievement is something you should be born into, not something you aspire to.

It’s kind of surprising that this list would perpetuate those stereotypes since their antithesis, in the form of Sarah Palin, got such high marks from NRO.

No responses yet

DVD Review: The Departed, The Covenant

Since Little Quip is knocking on two years old, we rarely make it out to the first run movies. Sure, there are a plethora of films featuring happy, friendly, animated creatures, but since we crave a movie for grown ups, we’re relegated to NetFlix. It’s been a while since I shared any thoughts on the crop of available DVDs, so Mrs. Quip and I sat down this weekend to catch up on a couple of recent releases.

The Departed

First up was The Departed, the Martin Scorsese directed Oscar winner. The only other nominee I have caught so far is Little Miss Sunshine, so my gauge may be a little off, but the rest of the BP nominees must have been pretty mediocre if The Departed scored the win. It wasn’t a bad movie, but it wasn’t terribly good either.

DiCaprio and Damon both did a very good job as undercover agents who have infiltrated the enemy territory and convinced their respective bosses of their loyalty. Toward the end of the film, DiCaprio tells Damon that he had the favor and trust of their boss – Jack Nicholson. The clear implication is that DiCaprio the rat, was more convincing to Costello than Damon the employee.

Unfortunately, the same can’t be said of their acting. Damon (and I know a lot of people disagree with this) is simply a much better actor than DiCaprio. Maybe the problem is Damon is just much more comfortable with the Southie accent, but he’s just more convincing. The two, however, completely outclass Nicholson.

Jack has reached the end of his career and apparently decided to keep playing the same character again and again. He’s now revised the same role for Batman, Witches of Eastwick, and The Departed, to mention a few. He’s going to end up like Marlon Brando – able to charge exorbitant amounts of money for the draw of his name, but ultimately unable to capture any of the magic of his earlier roles.

The biggest problem with The Departed, however, is the story. It’s predictable, there is little intrigue, and the ending is so contrived it’s pathetic. The story builds up this semi-adversarial relationship between DiCaprio and Wahlberg, and you figure the end will feature Wahlberg coming to the defense of his undercover agent. Instead, they conveniently suspend Wahlberg’s character in some sort of other-world where he completely ceases to exist. That is until he appears at the end of the film to tidy up the damage.

The ending is evidence of Quentin Tarantino’s impact on Hollywood. In just about every one of his films, the ending is the same – everybody dies. Scorsese took a page from that playbook and came up with a concocted story, and a weak ending to achieve the same effect. If that’s what they were after with this story, they should have gone to the master and let Quentin helm the pic.

The movie was entertaining, but of all the films that could have earned Scorsese the Oscar, Raging Bull and Taxi Driver were much better. This, to me, has the feeling of “we’re sorry” Oscars. They wanted to recognize Scorsese for being passed over by rewarding a rather mediocre movie with the Best Pic and Best Director nods. If you want to see Scorsese at his best, skip this and rent Goodfellas.

The Covenant

The Covenant is one of those films that has a great premise, and yet completely fails to deliver through a combination of poor acting, poor direction, poor writing, and poor special effects. If you stirke out on every one of those, you’re done. That’s where this movie comes in. Skip it on DVD, skip it on cable, and try to avoid the overwhelming sense of shame you’ll get from watching it.

The premise is, like I said, intriguing. What if the Salem witches were, in fact, actually witches? What if they had remarkable powers, some went into hiding after the trials, and their bloodlines continued with those powers through to present day. Sounds like it could make a good movie, right? Yes. But not this one.

Instead, the writers implement the cliché machine and start cranking out pablum. About five minutes into this flick, I turned to Mrs. Quip and asked if she had figured out the storyline. She replied that she had figured out the plot, the character development and the ending. It really is that bad.

We kept watching. We were hoping for, at the very least, an awesome battle to the death between the good guy and the bad guy. What we got though, was a weak version of catch featuring sparkling orbs of goo that make the ground explode when you drop the ball. Compound that with the typical plot device of “We never found the bad guys body… hmmm… what could that mean?” and you end up with a lame set up for a possible sequel.

If you don’t mind watching a movie, knowing full well that it may make you retarded, then this is the flick for you.

No responses yet

DVD Review – The Sentinel

Sep 25 2006 Published by under Action Movies, Movie Reviews, Movies

I’ll be honest, I had less than no interest in seeing The Sentinel when it hit theaters. I actively tried to avoid it. That was still my plan until a guy on a plane from DC to Denver told me how good it was. I broke down and added it to my queue on NetFlix.

It’s not terrible, but it’s certainly not great. Keifer Sutherland as Jack Bauer David Breckinridge, turned in the same performance he’s given for the last three seasons of 24. Michael Douglas gave the same performance he gives in every single movie he has ever been in. Kim Baisinger proved, yet again, how totally one dimensional she is. Last but not least, Eva Longoria is completely useless. If standing around looking pretty was an Olympic sport, she might be a medalist; but I don’t see any Oscars in her future.

Despite the flattest cast in a movie that I have seen in a long time, the movie was surprisingly decent. It’s not going to win any Oscars either, but it’s probably an ok way to kill two hours without feeling cheated.

The story is rather thin and revolves around a plot to assassinate the President that involves a Secret Service agent. Michael Douglas is boning the first lady, and due to an inadvertent stop in the wrong coffee shop on the wrong day ends up as the prime suspect.

The premise was solid, but I would have liked a more suspenseful movie. You knew who the killers were, you knew that Michael Douglas was hiding the affair, and you knew the back-story on the tension between Douglas and Keifer in the first five minutes of the film. I would have preferred a script that let those details out gradually.

Tell me Douglas is having an affair, but make me think it’s with Sutherland’s wife before you reveal he’s actually banging the President’s wife. Better yet, make the affair the reason for the assassination attempt, but make the bad guy the First Lady. She could want to get away from the President, but not want a messy divorce, so she gets one agent to do the dirty work while she’s servicing Douglas. As it is, the plot involves some odd reference to the former KGB and a double agent that really falls flat 15 years after the fall of the Berlin Wall.

In the unlikely event the guy from Greeley stumbles upon my blog, I’ll say thanks for the tip. The movie did entertain me for a while, but that was largely due to my time spent thinking of ways it could have been better.

No responses yet

DVD Review- Ultraviolet

Jul 20 2006 Published by under Action Movies, Awful Movies, Movie Reviews, Movies

DVD ReviewMoviesI woke up feeling like it’s one of those days that make me want to point out stuff that sucks. That made me realize that I had not really been commenting on the pop culture side of my pop culture and politics blog. So it’s time for another DVD review.

The lucky DVD today is Ultraviolet. It opened in March with nine million dollar weekend and then disappeared fast. I have to admit I’m a big fan of the female lead – Milla Jovovich. She’s extensively easy on the eyes, so she keeps getting cast despite being a dreadful actress. In this movie, her near-total lack of acting talent is on full display.

The premise to the movie is a blood disease has turned many humans into light-sensitive super humans – with great speed and strength. The humans come to think of the afflicted as vampires and fear them. Milla plays a sort of pseudo-vampire assassin who despite not actually being a vampire can be resurrected over and over.

With characters operating at hyper-speed, the action sequences had the potential to be amazing Matrix-esque scenes with the “vampires” dodging bullets and such. But the action felt forced and low-budget. The camera work was dizzying – which is usually said in a good way, but not this time.

The plot also involved a bizarre lost-love/lost-child storyline that added nothing and really just added 10 minutes to an otherwise 80 minute movie.

If you’re looking for an action movie, this isn’t it. If you’re looking for a date movie, you’re also out of luck on that. If you want to watch Milla Jovovich act badly and change colors as she jumps around – and don’t expect to see her naked – then this is the movie for you. (If you’d prefer to see her in the buff, albeit briefly, watch The Fifth Element. If you’d rather avoid nudity, but are ok with underwear, check out Kuffs.)

No responses yet

DVD Review – Derailed & King Kong

May 21 2006 Published by under Action Movies, Drama, Movie Reviews, Movies

DVD ReviewOnce the kid was born, movies in theaters became a thing of the past. Now, the wife and I are big fans of NetFlix. A while back I started to create a recurring post called the DVD Review. The thought was, I’d offer thoughts on movies after the luster of their release marketing wore off.

This week’s delivery brought King Kong, Derailed, and Pride & Prejudice. We haven’t made it through Pride & Prejudice yet, so I’ll hit the others.

Derailed – This movie didn’t have a lot to offer. At all. At any point. The plot was thin. The characters were uninteresting. The pace was slow and the story predictable. Aniston didn’t bring much to the flick, and Owen himself didn’t seem to care what happened to his character.

The movie tells the tale of a married man who meets a woman on a train, gets involved in a tryst, and ends up being mugged and watching her get raped. Shortly thereafter, the mugger begins blackmailing him. That has the potential to set up a suspenseful movie, but it never gets there. Aniston refuses to talk to the police about the brutal rape because her husband would learn of the affair – ignoring the possibility that her husband wouldn’t notice the physical trauma from the rape.

The movie spends the next 102 minutes dragging the viewer through one hackneyed premise after another. If you haven’t figured out the plot from that brief recap of the first 10 minutes of film, you might enjoy this. If, like most people, you’ve already put the whole story together, save your time and money.

Before the movie serves up the ending you have known was coming for 85 minutes, you’re trying to do your taxes in your head and wondering how you can get the last 90 minutes of your life back.

King King – Before I moved this blog to Word Press (and in doing so lost all my previous posts) I spent a lot of time railing on this picture. Only one note made it into the post-transition blog.

I’m still amazed that Paramount spent nearly $300 million to make and market this film. It’s much better than I expected, but not $200 million better. I had seen most of it in the Jurassic Park franchise. The cast spends two hours and 45 minutes of the 3:10 run time stuck on Isla Nublar Skull Island being chased by dinosaurs and giant insects. The remaining 25 minutes is spent watching Kong slide on ice in New York.

They did manage to make King Kong much more disturbing and sinister than I ever thought possible. The natives on Skull Island, for instance, were like something from under the staircase in a Wes Craven flick. Seriously, what’s with the mutants and what about a giant monkey causes their eyeballs to roll up inside their heads?

The one thing I found really interesting was the model work. I’m trying to figure out whether Peter Jackson meant for all of the models to look cheesy or if that was an accident. If you’ve seen any comments by the director on that topic, send them along.

In all, I’d be hard pressed to recommend Derailed to anyone other than insomniacs that don’t respond to medication. Kong is a good rent for the visuals. In the alternative, though, you could pull Jurassic Park or Jurassic Park III out of the cabinet and watch them. Just remember to imagine a giant gorilla thrown in with the raptors and T-Rex and you’re all set.

No responses yet

Older posts »